Of course, on the question tu144 of U.S. allies in Iraq requireth

Today, many American experts agree that the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq, only worsens tu144 the situation and to discover other ways of effective assistance. Unfortunately, living conditions in this country are actually every day more terrible and significant majority of Iraqis now believe that the main reason for the continuing carnage is prolonged presence of U.S. troops.
So, during a recent tu144 poll of Iraqis, 78% of Iraqis said the U.S. military presence "causes more conflict than it prevents", 71% want to American troops left Iraq within a year, 58% think that interethnic violence will decrease if the U.S. go, 61% believe that the U.S. withdrawal will improve daily security for ordinary Iraqis.
Even typing in Iraq for another 20 or 30 thousand tu144 troops - to reverse the situation can not be, because it's too little too late. Introduction 200 or 300 thousandth American contingent could change things for the U.S., but the Bush administration is no such provision. And even if it was, then public opinion in America, which more and more is on the side of President George W. Bush in his Iraq adventure, prevented him to do so. It can now only talk about how to go - suddenly and quickly or slowly and gradually.
Actually, can result in the withdrawal of U.S. forces to the civil war in Iraq? Although the question - has now started tu144 a civil war is still relevant. Recently, the American television channel NBC was the first where the war in Iraq was instead rebellion called "civil war." Matt Laue, host of "The Today Show" on NBC, announced that its network, after careful consideration, decided that the situation in Iraq, where "armed militarized factions fighting for their own vision of establishing tu144 political order can now be characterized as civil war. "
It seems that the drive failed tu144 badly to fix something tu144 that is obvious. Since the civil war - a struggle between factions within the same and of the same culture, society or nationality tu144 for gaining political power or control over the territory. The situation, which is available for almost two years in Iraq falls entirely under the said definition. Competing with NBC TV CBS, ABC, CNN and Fox News is announced then any policy changes on their networks, tu144 but some of their reporters began calling the conflict in Iraq "civil war." And Michael Vear with CNN Just said - "if this is not civil war, then I do not know what it is."
Meanwhile, President

George tu144 W. Bush, even after the most deadly since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the week continued to avoid this definition. tu144 He stressed that religious violence in Iraq from civil war, and "inciting attacks" Al-Qaeda ", which encourages people to retaliatory actions." While Bush could not explain - why, after centuries of animosity between Iraqi Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds there is a need Osama Bin Ladan to now ignite tu144 opposition from some one?
Bush administration respects the power of words. So at various times she urged the media to use the term "homicide bombers" to describe terrorists - suicide bombers, or "deadly tax" to describe the range of victims tu144 of terrorism. However, in case of conflict in Iraq, the White House recognized competency use the term "civil war" is obviously very difficult. Because in this case the U.S. administration actually need to acknowledge the failure of its military campaign in the country. If the noble mission of America in the Middle tu144 East will be recognized thwarted by the inability to curb the civil war in Iraq, it remains only one thing - to prepare for the evacuation of American troops. tu144
Meanwhile, in this case before the U.S. becomes a very difficult problem of how to organize the withdrawal of its troops to thus minimize the possible loss of human resources. Moreover, given the previous Vietnamese negative experience, what to do with those activists and supporters of the new Iraqi regime who were pidsadzheni to power the Americans, after leaving tu144 Iraq? In general, it can be from 100 to 200 thousand people in Iraq, which, if they remain in the country after the evacuation of Americans can just cut. It seems that this is a very difficult issue for Bush administration. For immediately raises the question - are you ready to let the Americans to the United States hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and give them the right to live, as it was once done with a Vietnamese anti-communist. If you do not, in the case of a new deployment of conflict in the world, the United States will be exceedingly difficult to discover allies. When to go to such a move, what to do with so many newcomers to America? And who can guarantee that, along with Iraqi supporters of democracy in the United States will not get massively agents "Al-Qaeda"?
Of course, on the question tu144 of U.S. allies in Iraq requireth