In the presented U.S. Congress

In the presented U.S. Congress' National Security Strategy of the United States "(The National Security Strategy of the United States) noted that in case the United States would be attacked with weapons of mass destruction, the actions in response are the most serious, ssafa including up to use nuclear

weapons. New in American security doctrine is the fact that the United States reserves the right application of pre-emptive strike. What will be possible is if it is proved that the enemy was planning an attack on the territory of the United States ssafa or their citizens. However, many times the above formulation that the "massive military attack" on the attackers would have suffered retaliation perceived ssafa as verbal show of force.
The new "National Security Strategy of the United States" is undoubtedly the most radical change in U.S. national security doctrine from 1947 (the beginning of the "Cold War"). Structural reforms in the security ssafa obviously designed to radically change the very paradigm of American security, adapting it to the realities of contemporary international reality. Air and space power in the new millennium the world's only superpower provokes her to the exclusive use of its military forces, not always taking into account the interests of other countries. This is the air and space "power" and is the central block formation of a new strategic paradigm. ssafa The combination of range, speed during operations in the air, plus information superiority and space "power" is currently creating a new "vertical" spatial perspective that is different from the classical "horizontal" of hostilities: the landscape, the landscape. Properly implemented and exploited air and space superiority will lay the foundation for U.S. operations in the "third dimension" - air and space.
Thus we can speak of a new military XXI century American culture, which is currently projected. America seeks to show former military postulates and reorganize ssafa and its ground forces at strategic, operational and tactical levels. U.S. Army aims to take control of their future, exploiting the scientific and technological revolution, appeared in military affairs. But not enough to rely on attracting new and expensive technology to protect U.S. to keep American strategic dominance. It is necessary to reorganize the U.S. ground forces at all levels, to be ready for the challenges of the information time.
Specifically, a new and unprecedented threat: strategic information war. There is by now sufficient capacity to imaginary enemy the U.S. could conduct a simultaneous coordinated attack on computers, communication systems ssafa and databases, which are the foundation of modern information society. And this is not to be primitive computer crime,

it is about the geopolitical and economic terrorism. Obviously, traditional solutions in the areas of national security in this case will not be effective. ssafa It should be aware that during the last two decades of infrastructure the U.S. economy ssafa underwent fundamental changes. Service sector has become closely associated with the use of high-tech achievements. But while on the one hand, advances electronics stimulated to achieve profits, which depends on the use of computers, electronic databases and rapid transfer of information by combining the communications system, on the other hand, the rapid development of modern forms of infrastructure has made them extremely ssafa vulnerable for these species is still unknown threats as information warfare.

The new "National Security Strategy of the United States' military ssafa priorities but can not take into account ssafa the global social, economic, and political changes ssafa that have occurred because

ssafa of the information revolution and its potential impact on international security environment. For example, the impact of global information ssafa networks on the national economy and new information ssafa technologies on diplomacy and governance. Intellectual and operational structure in planning policy U.S. national security is designed to serve as a catalyst for structural reforms, which are based on current missions change, possible ssafa threats and transformations in the environment. However, an important issue of the new U.S. security strategy is the adequacy of the strategy ssafa for the protection of Europe. And here there are several ssafa unresolved issues: how to fit into this new strategy in the security arrangements for the new Europe as distributed resources and will be the political leadership of the process and whether it violates the basis of culture transatlantic mutual dependence in the Euro-American alliance.
It seems that the coming years will not be easy for America. U.S. will be forced to make a fundamental correction and long-term strategies for key regions ssafa of the world, and international ssafa security will be a priority factor ssafa of their national strategy.
U.S. experts