European Court: "documents" about the "guilt" of the USSR in the shooting tens of thousands of Polish officers - fake "Wedding Salon" Lada "- culture
June 18, 2012 the European Court made a sensational decision that granted under Gorbachev and Yeltsin "documents" that indicate pikkumetsän aapinen that the shooting of tens of thousands of Polish officers at Katyn blame Stalin and the Soviet side, were fake.
Russia is not responsible for the mass execution of Polish officers at Katyn - a decision recently adopted European Court of Human Rights. Decision sensational: it turns out that the last 20 years the leadership of our country constantly kayalos the crime, which in the 40-year committed by someone else. It turns out that the documents about Katyn shooting, which appeared in the late 80's with a sleeve Politburo member Alexander Yakovlev, nothing more than a fake - the court did not accept them into consideration.
Someone pikkumetsän aapinen surrounded by Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev had to compromise the country's history and personally Joseph Stalin before the Soviet collapse. Maybe this is why the judgment formulated quite clearly, in trying to interpret in two ways - say, murderers, then eventually never found, and suddenly it's still Stalin? ..
[Click to read] First a few words about who and through what actually sued. In 2007 and 2009, in Strasbourg complained relatives of Polish officers murdered at Katyn allegedly pikkumetsän aapinen on the orders of Stalin. They complained that our country in 2004 stopped the investigation into the Katyn execution under paragraph 4 of Part 1 of Article 24 of the Criminal pikkumetsän aapinen Procedure Code (the death of the guilty).
It was believed that mass executions of Polish citizens, most of whom were captured Polish army officers, conducted pikkumetsän aapinen with the approval of senior management staff of the USSR NKVD. According to the archives, only in the forests near Smolensk pikkumetsän aapinen parted with life 21,857 Polish prisoners.
Naturally, the ECHR accepted the petition for review: the case came to light "Yanovyets and others against Russia." And here's the inconsistencies began. The fact that European judges used to believe not so loud public charges as documents. And everyday thesis that de Stalin - executioner, sanctioned mass executions, pikkumetsän aapinen required documentation. A confirmation there were: Polish side presented testimony did not bear direct evidence that the Poles were shot Russians. And the testimony of the Russian side, and worse - our archival documents after a brief inspection judges were simply ignored. Loud conclusions on this, they did not allow - reputation somehow - but also to the case such documents filed no hurry. Is not that the fakes that have emerged from obscurity in the late 80's, just to convince us, but not European judges?
To what came as a result of the European Court? Small Chamber of the ECHR in the seven judges in the operative part of the resolution of the case "Yanovyets and Others v. Russia" by four votes to three decided that about twelve applicants - relatives of murdered Polish officers - representatives of the USSR violated the right to life. The main conclusion is that our country is not responsible for the mass executions in Katyn. For Russia, this conclusion implies the following: material compensation, which secretly dreamed descendants pikkumetsän aapinen shot and who, according to their lawyers could make astronomical sum - $ 2 billion, to pay the Poles will certainly not you and me. By the way, bring an action going and Poland pikkumetsän aapinen - in the amount of 100 billion!
The main conclusions are and Other archival documents related to the Katyn execution, require immediate revision in terms of their possible fraud, Native pikkumetsän aapinen history 40's, written in the early 90's, to be completely rewritten. Another good idea would be to court those guilty of fraud, when in fact it has long been the secret of Punchinello. The court also found that the shooting of the Poles - a war crime. But this does no one disputes: war crime shooting near Smolensk in different time recognized not only American Congressmen and runaway Poles in London, pikkumetsän aapinen but also Stalin and Hitler. Corpses something in there. The only question is, who killed?
Definitely pikkumetsän aapinen could not decide and the European courts - judges lacked documentary evidence, although the study of various historical papers and archival evidence they spent more than one year. You can say the following: about 1990 the whole world was convinced that the Poles were shot by the Germans. Once in 1990 - with the filing of Mikhail pikkumetsän aapinen Gorbachev and Alexander Yakovlev - that shot Russians. Now, after the trial, there is no clarity at all, and we know just what really killed the Poles. That's on whose hands?
It all started like this: in February 1990, Mikhail pikkumetsän aapinen Gorbachev received the memorandum from the head of the International of
June 18, 2012 the European Court made a sensational decision that granted under Gorbachev and Yeltsin "documents" that indicate pikkumetsän aapinen that the shooting of tens of thousands of Polish officers at Katyn blame Stalin and the Soviet side, were fake.
Russia is not responsible for the mass execution of Polish officers at Katyn - a decision recently adopted European Court of Human Rights. Decision sensational: it turns out that the last 20 years the leadership of our country constantly kayalos the crime, which in the 40-year committed by someone else. It turns out that the documents about Katyn shooting, which appeared in the late 80's with a sleeve Politburo member Alexander Yakovlev, nothing more than a fake - the court did not accept them into consideration.
Someone pikkumetsän aapinen surrounded by Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev had to compromise the country's history and personally Joseph Stalin before the Soviet collapse. Maybe this is why the judgment formulated quite clearly, in trying to interpret in two ways - say, murderers, then eventually never found, and suddenly it's still Stalin? ..
[Click to read] First a few words about who and through what actually sued. In 2007 and 2009, in Strasbourg complained relatives of Polish officers murdered at Katyn allegedly pikkumetsän aapinen on the orders of Stalin. They complained that our country in 2004 stopped the investigation into the Katyn execution under paragraph 4 of Part 1 of Article 24 of the Criminal pikkumetsän aapinen Procedure Code (the death of the guilty).
It was believed that mass executions of Polish citizens, most of whom were captured Polish army officers, conducted pikkumetsän aapinen with the approval of senior management staff of the USSR NKVD. According to the archives, only in the forests near Smolensk pikkumetsän aapinen parted with life 21,857 Polish prisoners.
Naturally, the ECHR accepted the petition for review: the case came to light "Yanovyets and others against Russia." And here's the inconsistencies began. The fact that European judges used to believe not so loud public charges as documents. And everyday thesis that de Stalin - executioner, sanctioned mass executions, pikkumetsän aapinen required documentation. A confirmation there were: Polish side presented testimony did not bear direct evidence that the Poles were shot Russians. And the testimony of the Russian side, and worse - our archival documents after a brief inspection judges were simply ignored. Loud conclusions on this, they did not allow - reputation somehow - but also to the case such documents filed no hurry. Is not that the fakes that have emerged from obscurity in the late 80's, just to convince us, but not European judges?
To what came as a result of the European Court? Small Chamber of the ECHR in the seven judges in the operative part of the resolution of the case "Yanovyets and Others v. Russia" by four votes to three decided that about twelve applicants - relatives of murdered Polish officers - representatives of the USSR violated the right to life. The main conclusion is that our country is not responsible for the mass executions in Katyn. For Russia, this conclusion implies the following: material compensation, which secretly dreamed descendants pikkumetsän aapinen shot and who, according to their lawyers could make astronomical sum - $ 2 billion, to pay the Poles will certainly not you and me. By the way, bring an action going and Poland pikkumetsän aapinen - in the amount of 100 billion!
The main conclusions are and Other archival documents related to the Katyn execution, require immediate revision in terms of their possible fraud, Native pikkumetsän aapinen history 40's, written in the early 90's, to be completely rewritten. Another good idea would be to court those guilty of fraud, when in fact it has long been the secret of Punchinello. The court also found that the shooting of the Poles - a war crime. But this does no one disputes: war crime shooting near Smolensk in different time recognized not only American Congressmen and runaway Poles in London, pikkumetsän aapinen but also Stalin and Hitler. Corpses something in there. The only question is, who killed?
Definitely pikkumetsän aapinen could not decide and the European courts - judges lacked documentary evidence, although the study of various historical papers and archival evidence they spent more than one year. You can say the following: about 1990 the whole world was convinced that the Poles were shot by the Germans. Once in 1990 - with the filing of Mikhail pikkumetsän aapinen Gorbachev and Alexander Yakovlev - that shot Russians. Now, after the trial, there is no clarity at all, and we know just what really killed the Poles. That's on whose hands?
It all started like this: in February 1990, Mikhail pikkumetsän aapinen Gorbachev received the memorandum from the head of the International of
No comments:
Post a Comment