Americans came to Iraq with good goals - lose dictatorial regime of Saddam Hussein and help society

The president's decision to withdraw the United States by the end of December 2011 all U.S. troops from Iraq is a mixed reaction in expert international circles. Indeed, on the one hand, it seems to be a blow to the prestige of America as the world's most powerful state in the Middle East, and on the other - gives the U.S. an opportunity to get rid of the image of "invader" and discard burdensome economic costs of war.
Alert completed requirements to join the army nine war that cost America more than one trillion dollars and claimed over 4,400 lives of American requirements to join the army soldiers, many Americans perceived unambiguously positive. After all these billions and billions of taxpayers' money could be more efficiently used to build the country's infrastructure, education, health care, benefits for vulnerable categories of the population.
Barack Obama, who inherited the Iraq War from George requirements to join the army W. Bush, it was necessary to take this difficult decision. After all, he was in a situation that is very reminiscent of the situation in which one time got Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev requirements to join the army of the Afghan war. Because, as in the case of Gorbachev, the decision to withdraw must primates someone who did not accept him about the invasion.
I can not say that the United States lost the Iraq campaign, but also we can not say that they won it. When George Bush and Condoleezza Rice took the decision to start, they intended to win. However, if the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein has been successfully reset and the Americans won the war militarily, then started playing politics with the Shiite majority, they opened Iraq direct Iranian influence.
Some experts suggest that Americans are leaving Iraq at the most inopportune time, because after they leave the Iranians during the year appear in Iraq. Perhaps this assumption is under a foundation, but the circumstances for Americans lately evolved in such a way that Barack Obama had no choice.
For decades, when the forces of any country were located in other states, the soldiers received immunity from prosecution. The Iraqi government refused to continue that protection of U.S. troops, and as a result, President Obama was forced to return U.S. troops home.
The United States has influence on Iraq until go from there. This is an obvious factor in the war. Americans voluntarily waive this right, knowing that work to stabilize Iraq is not finished and completed.
Americans came to Iraq with good goals - lose dictatorial regime of Saddam Hussein and help society oppressed become free. We can say that the first objective has been successfully implemented, and that's about a free society, there arise many doubts.
At this time, the Middle East is very similar to cauldron of political

uncertainty. Iran, which already came close to acquiring requirements to join the army nuclear weapons, this uncertainty only increases. The presence of U.S. troops in Iraq was a deterrent, which forced the regime Iranian mullahs think about the fact that U.S. military forces from Iraqi territory can be is turned toward Iran. Now, this deterrent is removed, and a direct path to the Iranian expansion.
Today nobody can say exactly what future awaits Iraq after troops exit the United States. But one thing is certain - the U.S. military during this time showed examples of courage and self-sacrifice defending the possibility of democratic choice of the Iraqi people. In appalling conditions of high temperature and flak jackets, at a time when the second often difficult requirements to join the army to distinguish from the enemy, in the midst of hidden improvised explosive devices and suicide bombers.
What former U.S. President George W. Bush started a war with the Iraqi regime under false pretenses presence of weapons of mass destruction, now is not replayed. However, a clear positive introduction of American troops was the destruction of the tyranny of Saddam Hussein. Although, in this case, the goal of creating a stable democratic Iraq, or at least a stable Iraq, remains in question. After the overthrow in 2003 of Saddam Hussein led to an increase in Iranian influence. During the Iran-Iraq War 1980-1988 years Tehran could build a satellite political movements and intelligence network among the Shiites of Iraq, who make up about 60% of the total population.
After 2003, the Revolutionary Guards has significantly strengthened the influence of Iran in Iraq. This is realized by training Shiite militants financing development projects in the Shiite community and the settlement of disputes among Shiite politicians to help create a viable government.
It must be admitted that the Iranian requirements to join the army influence is very significant, but it is not irreversible. Ob'yednanist targets Shiite version of Islam, in some cases, often issued by evidence of his unwavering solidarity and common purpose in world affairs. This is very reminiscent of false confidence-time