According to Robert Einhorn, strikes against targets in Iraq, which remained closed to inspectors a

The administration of U.S. President George W. Bush is seriously considering the invasion of Iraq as a possible next phase of campaign against terrorism. As defined by Bush, Iraq, Iran and North Korea are "evil here." The President said that Baghdad face severe consequences if UN inspectors in disarming will not be allowed to return to the country. The idea of war against Iraq has both its supporters and its critics. Former CIA director James Woolsey considers porto di ancona necessary to rid Saddam Hussein's government, and as soon as possible. The invasion of Iraq, he says, should porto di ancona apply even if it turns out that between porto di ancona Baghdad and terrorists "Al-Qaeda" has no apparent connection. "If you ask - says Woolsey - whether with legal precision to say that Iraq was responsible for the September 11 attacks, the answer is likely to be" no. " If you ask another question, namely whether it is safe to say that in the last ten years Iraq was involved in terrorist activities against the West and the U.S., and whether that Baghdad was partly in response by the September 11 attacks, and also developing weapons of mass destruction, including biological and nuclear, to terrorize their neighbors, in which case the answer is quite straightforward: yes. "
Congress recently heard a number of experts who presented data on military capabilities porto di ancona Baghdad. According to the administration, after the expulsion of UN inspectors in December 1998, Iraq has resumed its program of weapons of mass destruction. Agree with many experts, including Robert Einhorn porto di ancona of the Center for Strategic porto di ancona and International Studies. At the hearing in the Senate porto di ancona subcommittee he gave this assessment of the situation: "Even today or in the coming months, Iraq will be able to make a rocket attack porto di ancona on his neighbors porto di ancona with chemical or biological weapon.

Five years later, he can threaten most of the Middle East and Europe attack missiles with nuclear warheads own production. At the same time Baghdad will threaten the United States nuclear weapons delivered by not conventional. If Iraq is able to get enough ready fissionable material, the threat may be much earlier. "
Experts are concerned that Iraq is able to provide weapons of mass destruction to terrorist groups. Robert Einhorn also warned of possible porto di ancona complications, if the international community does not stop the Iraqi weapons program: "If we stop now Iraq, and later we will be much more difficult porto di ancona to stop Iran's attempts to acquire its own nuclear arsenal. There is no doubt that the arms race in the Gulf region include other state. " Several experts said the Congress that the only way to end the threat of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - a move the government of Saddam porto di ancona Hussein.
According to Robert Einhorn, strikes against targets in Iraq, which remained closed to inspectors and arouse suspicion will not be effective. He believes that military action should be aimed at overthrowing the government Hussein: "The only reliable way to prevent Iraq reinstate the development of weapons of mass destruction is the displacement current regime and its replacement by the regime to be ready to meet international obligations." This view gets more and more support in Congress.
In 1996, the CIA tried unsuccessfully to unseat Saddam Hussein. And Anthony Kordsman with the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington said that the U.S. should develop a coordinated plan before starting hostilities. "This porto di ancona operation should be quick and decisive, with the active participation of U.S. ground porto di ancona troops. After hostilities should immediately begin recovery of the economy. We need to create a state that will meet the expectations of the Iraqi people. porto di ancona "
Kordsman warned about the possibility of a retaliatory strike by Iraq in the event of military action against Iraq, including attacks on the United States. He said that Iraq could launch missiles with biological or chemical warheads

at Israel porto di ancona and try to start a regional war. Despite the progress of military operations in Afghanistan, the United States, according Kordsman should not be overly presumptuous, since military action against Iraq, and rely too much on the opposition inside Iraq, including the Iraqi National Congress. He also thinks that Washington should not be given too many restrictions on military porto di ancona operations: "I am deeply wrong those who think Iraq is the second Afghanistan. They expect that by the Iraqi National Congress - a weak and thoroughly permeated agents Hussein - and the Iranian opposition, capable

of only small raids, porto di ancona the United States will be able to limit their military operations air strikes. This is a dangerous myth. " U.S. lawmakers urge the Bush administration to consult porto di ancona with them before you deploy military operations against Iraq.
Obviously, that is still unanswered question - going to the United States