George W. Bush, who came to power under the banner of strengthening U.S. forces are now in the firs

In the new century looming shape forming new defensive solutions, both in Europe and the Americas. Since President George W. Bush actively shaping new military doctrine of the United States, army careers in particular, he proposed several times to reduce the number of U.S. nuclear warheads. A similar initiative has surprised

many supporters of Bush and generated passionate debate in the American press.
George W. Bush, who came to power under the banner of strengthening U.S. forces are now in the first year of his presidency, the Pentagon

intends to allocate less money than promised army careers if he wins Democrat Al Gore. According to the latest budget, which was enacted under Clinton, U.S. military spending had to make in 2001 fiscal year $ 309 billion. Bush has now proposed army careers to add to this amount to only $ 4.5 billion (which are mainly for higher

wages war and to improve their living conditions). Then when Al Gore during the campaign promised the Pentagon has an additional $ 10 billion.
Many in the Pentagon and beyond feel that they cheated. Bush supporters say he allegedly decided not to do anything in a hurry, but preferred informed decisions wait until the experts do not hold radical analysis of America's military needs in the new century. Among others, it is a total reassessment of the military values, which will also apply to the U.S. nuclear arsenal. Before the election, George W. Bush has repeatedly made statements that tends to make it dramatically reduced army careers without regard to strategic agreements army careers with Russia, which in this case are irrelevant. They set the maximum number of warheads that are allowed to have both nuclear powers, while Bush is going to voluntarily reduce its unilateral below minimum. This is a possible reduction army careers from the current 7,000 warheads to approximately 2,000 warheads.
Proponents of the cuts say among other things that it will release the funds to build a limited missile defense system, which promised to expand Bush. But skeptics, in turn, point out that in contrast to the relatively cheap nuclear weapons, missile shield will be very expensive (preliminary estimate - $ 60 billion), as cancellation of warheads, and some will not have enough money to deploy the project. However, nuclear power ON - is only half of the case. Judging from what view to manage army careers defense priorities assigned to the Pentagon legendary but little known outside, counsel defense minister Andrew Marshall, the American generals and admirals a lot of surprises army careers are not always pleasant for them. 79 year old Marshall, who started his career in 1949, nuclear analyst in one of the corporations, known as a supporter of the ideas that seem revolutionary army careers one, and another unrealistic.

So for example, he believes that the Pentagon was too focused on the problems of Europe (where Marshall will not be a major military conflicts), and not paying enough attention to Asia, where more growing threat creates China.
In a situation which is America's European army careers allies must come to terms with the fact that President George W. Bush cancels promises to create a missile defense system with which he addressed the American people during last year's election campaign. Although it is clear that the Bush administration plans to deploy a missile defense system as a cause sedation and anxiety on the part of Washington's European allies. But as NATO Secretary General George Robertson at the international security conference, which was held recently in Munich, from America's European allies they had no complaints.
"I think - said George Robertson - that some people are eager to split America and Europe in the missile shield. However, those of us who were at the conference can attest that the atmosphere there was calm. Instead of looking back, we were looking forward. The United States made it clear that they intend to deploy

an effective missile defense system, and we must come to terms with the fact that this was a decision made during the election campaign. We must treat it seriously and with due respect. "
Lord Robertson issued the following statement after meeting with representatives of the European army careers Union, which discussed other sensitive issues in US-European relations - plan for independent European contingent of the NATO Rapid Reaction Force. This contingent is to be designed to perform peacekeeping and crisis response in such cases where NATO forces, for whatever reason, did not want to be involved. Longtime allies of the USA and Europe are now trying to come to a common denominator in matters of military doctrine and the means to achieve its effective implementation. Because NATO is not a throwback to the Cold War