Monday, October 29, 2012

The same model for the 3 UAV armed forces? Is that right? In light of the mission military pics and

Defined the requirements for the joint operational unmanned aerial vehicles Armed Forces | Airpower - Information and Discussion on Civil and Military Aviation
Home Features The Look Agency's air bases and FAB defense of Brazilian airspace John Boyd, the fighter pilot who changed the art of aerial combat military pics John Boyd, the fighter pilot who changed the art of aerial combat - Part 2 John Boyd, the fighter pilot who changed the art of aerial combat - Part 3 Operation 'Princess of the Pampas' fighters and their generations headdresses The Air Forces of the World Lecture Colonel Terrence Fornof Profile USAF F-16XL: the 'Falcon' which was shot by 'Strike Eagle' A-9A Northrop Su-27SK, the Russian proposal for the Yak-130 FX Gates Open DCTA What is Airpower? Advertising / Advertising

Who makes the site? Magazine Defense Forces
The Ministry of Defence, through Normative 2384/MD of September 5, 2012, established the Joint Operational Requirements (ROC) for the acquisition of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Intelligence, Reconnaissance, Surveillance and Target Acquisition (UAV / ARP ISTAR), intended for multiple jobs Armed Forces.
The requirements were obtained by the consolidation of operational and technical military pics characteristics common employment of the three armed forces, constant in their documentation guidelines and standards, after meetings coordinated by the Commission on Military Logistics (COMLOG), held at the Ministry of Defence in 2012.
The requirements are divided into absolute, desirable and complementary. Absolutes are required in UAV / ARP ISTAR and its subsystems. The desirable, not mandatory, must be sought in UAV / ARP ISTAR by the increased functionality and provide greater

flexibility for the end user. They may already be in place, valuing the item evaluated. military pics The complementary, military pics not required or desirable,

value system choice UAV / ARP ISTAR, without unbalancing your review.
The performance of the platform must meet the following minimum parameters: - Action Radius = 160 (one hundred sixty) km - Autonomy> 16 (sixteen) h - Payload = 150 (one hundred and fifty) kg - Operating ceiling> 15,000

(fifteen thousand ) ft - Security features: - "Window Pilot" - automatic takeoff and landing - Wrap (breakdown of COMM) 9. the range in LOS (line-of-sight) should not be limited military pics to power transmission.
September 13, 2012 at 13:13 Announcement of UAVs, ground to air missiles, SISFRON, 5 corvettes military pics and missile Penguin w / MB, the vehicle Guarani walking program, and BR Scorpene Sub Nuc walking ... it seems that things are getting better! Just missing the FX-2!! Let's see what the vultures of duty will tell ...
Based on the characteristics of the UAV Avibrás seems to be what fits this profile. Of course, the actual Hermes 450 that the FAB is operating.
And follows the MD and his dirigisme absolutely suspect p / renewal of the means of the armed forces, if that was not enough the mess in Sisfron, we now have these edicts of antiaircraft

missiles and medium-altitude UAV's going the same way. Our armed forces are at serious risk of qndo and necessary estatem furnished c / systems and equipment of dubious military pics usefulness, or too expensive to operate and maintain.
The same model for the 3 UAV armed forces? Is that right? In light of the mission military pics and way of working completely distinct from each of the forces, does not seem appropriate standardization. At least that is what is observed worldwide are various types, large and small, fixed wing or rotary, with or without weapons, according to operational need. For the EB and MB may not be appropriate to have a UAV runway takeoff and landing. As for the FAB perhaps the scope and autonomy could be much larger than a tactical UAV used by ground forces. ??
Each line of this decision demonstrates that my thesis that the FX-2 game has been played, when it INCLUDES military pics the requirement that the winner of the FX-2 will have to be adopted in the future MUST nations of MB ...
No space here for SUPER Hornet and the absence of the Sea Gripen variant (actually if there might be a lack superior to Gripen NG E / F ie ABSOLUTE without even a demo / prototype).
Dear HRotor, this is obvious military pics and ululating. Requirements that are distinct and can be even conflicting, military pics and if this purchase is actually made in this way will have the force receiving equipment that fails to fulfill its mission, as with the EC-725.
The background for this is the desire to put the process of purchasing arms in civilian

hands tied to political parties. Indeed, what makes the almost doomed José Genoino in the Ministry of Defence?
"Gilberto Rezende said: September 15th, 2012 at 2:37 Every decision this line shows that my thesis that the FX-2 game has been played, military pics when

No comments:

Post a Comment